페이지 정보
본문
The concept of escorting, particularly in the context of supporting individuals with disabilities, has been a widely accepted practice in various environments including workplaces, universities, and public spaces.
However, this practice has also been criticized to criticism, with many arguing that it perpetuates and undermines social inequalities that are stemming from societal biases.
On one hand, the notion behind providing assistance someone with a impairment is to enhance well-being. In contrast, this 'act of kindness' can also be seen as a care-giving move that undermines the self-reliance and self-advocacy of the individual being supported.
Through providing assistance someone, we are basically stripping them of their self-determination and critical thinking abilities, implying that they are inadequate of operating the world on their own.
This social inequality is based on privilege, with the provider holding a higher level of authority and influence over the individual being supported.
Such is a reflection of the social standards that emphasize independence and self-reliance, believing that people with health conditions are essentially intolerant and sensitive.
As notion is not only restrictive but also exploitative, as it denies people with health conditions the opportunity to participate fully in their cultures and exercise their autonomy.
Moreover, elite female companions offering support can also be seen as a type of institutional gatekeeping, denying individuals with disabilities from accessing certain spaces or facilities that are deemed as too risky for them.
Through categorizing someone as unsuitable to manage certain environments, we are fundamentally justifying for them what they can and cannot do, curtailing their options and independence.
Identifying and overcoming such systemic biases requires a change in perspective. We require to shift towards from a protective perspective and facing a more liberating style that prioritizes the self-reliance and decision-making capacity of individuals with health conditions.
Such means participating people with disabilities in the decision-making process and requesting their feedback and consensus. It also means treating their critical thinking skills and self-determination.
In the end, our target should be to establish a increased welcoming and accessible setting, where people with disabilities have the equal alternatives and choices as anyone else.
Such requires a fundamental transformation of our cultural norms and beliefs, moving away a culture of protectionism and towards one that emphasizes and advocates autonomy, self-determination, and fairness.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.